2017/1 (23) ****************************************************************************************** * ****************************************************************************************** Year: 2017 Volume: 23 Issue: 1 Jana Nechutová M. Jan Hus, Panna Maria a Ovidius Maroš Nicák Východosýrsky výklad Modlitby Pánovej v liturgickej poéz Olga Navrátilová Bůh v etických koncepcích Anselma z Canterbury a Immanue Jan Zámečník Bible, janusovská tvář přírody a sténající tvorstvo Tabita Landová Komunikace evangelia jako nové paradigma praktické teolo Reviews Práce přijaté a obhájené v roce 2016 Full text whole issue [ URL "ETFENG-309-version1-tref_2017_1.pdf"] Content [ URL "ETFENG-309-version1-obsah.pdf"] ****************************************************************************************** * M. Jan Hus, Panna Maria a Ovidius ****************************************************************************************** Author: Jana Nechutová Abstract: Jan Hus, Jungfrau Maria und Ovidius Die Studie bringt jene Stellen aus den Traktaten, Predigten und exeg wo Mariens Würde mit derjenigen der Priester verglichen wird. Die be ordinierter Priester hätte/soll gesagt haben nämlich in seiner Predi Jesu sei, da er das Leib des Herrn täglich (also anders als Maria, d epischer Dichtung De vetula (13. Jahrhundert); die tschechische Über Cite As: Nechutova?, Jana. “?. Jan Hus, Panna Maria a Ovidius.” Teologicka? r Full text (pdf) [ URL "ETFENG-309-version1-nechutova.pdf"] This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) [ URL "http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/"] . ****************************************************************************************** * Východosýrsky výklad Modlitby Pánovej v liturgickej poézii ****************************************************************************************** Author: Maroš Nicák Abstract: Ostsyrische Erläuterung des Gebets des Herrn in der liturgischen Poe Die ostsyrische hym-nologische Sammlung Ward? (13. Jh.) besteht vorw des liturgischen Jahres, wobei sie nach dem Evangelium gesungen und Ausle¬gungs¬mittel ostsyrischer Theologie dar. Das Memorieren theolo Gläubigen. In der ??n??? über das Beten und die Buße interpretiert d g?m?] „Verse“ aufgeteilt, im Rahmen deren 5 schwache ????? [r?gš?] „ Erläuterung des Dichters fokussiert sich nicht nur auf das damalige Tradition wider. Cite As: Nica?k, Maros?. “Východosýrsky výklad modlitby Pánovej v liturgickej Full text (pdf) [ URL "ETFENG-309-version1-nicak.pdf"] This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) [ URL "http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/"] . ****************************************************************************************** * Bůh v etických koncepcích Anselma z Canterbury a Immanuela Kanta ****************************************************************************************** Author: Olga Navrátilová Abstract: God in Ethical Conceptions of Anselm of Canterbury and Immanuel Kant The aim of this study is to explore the similarities and the differe the concept of God plays in both of them. This should be achieved by between the volition of justice and the volition of happiness and th is identical with God and God is thus the ultimate goal of all human understanding of ethics is, therefore, radically theocentric, while of morality and happiness. Cite As: Navra?tilova?, Olga. “Bůh v etických koncepcích Anselma z Canterbury Full text (pdf) [ URL "ETFENG-309-version1-navratilova.pdf"] ****************************************************************************************** * Bible, janusovská tvář přírody a sténající tvorstvo ****************************************************************************************** Author: Jan Zámečník Abstract: The Bible, Janus Face of Nature, and Groaning Creation – Reflections The article offers a critical response to Marek Vácha’s Tváří v tvář mainly on two topics – the concept of nature and the attitudes of hu about the Creator is highly problematic. It is asserted that, in con denying God’s existence. Further, the article deals with the conflic their own intrinsic value but, on the other hand, he cites without a only instrumentally. Cite As: Za?mec?ni?k, Jan. “Bible, Janusovská tvář přírody a sténající tvorst Full text (pdf) [ URL "ETFENG-309-version1-zamecnik.pdf"] This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) [ URL "http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/"] . ****************************************************************************************** * Komunikace evangelia jako nové paradigma praktické teologie ****************************************************************************************** Author: Tabita Landová Abstract: The Communication of the Gospel as a New Paradigm of Practical Theol The decreasing significance of traditional churches in the Czech soc should be appropriately defined in this context. The article discuss moment. According to these, the subject of practical theology could paradigm is gaining increasing attention in the German pastoral theo the church to communication of the Gospel in general. At the same ti the Czech practical theology. Cite As: Landova?, Tabita. “Komunikace evangelia jako nové paradigma praktick Full text (pdf) [ URL "ETFENG-309-version1-landova.pdf"] This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0) [ URL "http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/4.0/"] .